"Mail- Guajardo"

                  From G.G. to Dwight R./TPLU
                  (As I get more details on the mail on going work,
                  it will be posted for all to read, print and mail - Dwight R.)

                  There are 2 Appeals before the U S Court of Appeals for the 5th. Circuit in New Orleans. The former attorneys filed an Appeal after the U S Dist. Crt.- so call Dismissed the case on Sept. 20, 2003. But, on May 5, 2003, I filed a Motion for Contempt and for Injunctive Relief, the same was signed by me and one other inmate. The Motion, in short, argued that amendments to prison correspondence rules, which went into effect May 1, 2003, violated the Consent Decree in the mail case. This was around the time I was curtailed from writing to you and J C.

                  On Nov. 12, 2003, the same Judge who- so call, dismissed the mail issue case, denied our Motion for Contempt. So, I appealed. You well know that the 1983 Mail Rules (Consent Decree) had been in effect till May 1, 2003. For some unknown reason(s) to me besides the Sexual Publications, the mail case was reopened around 1989 or 1990 by some inmates and right after the PLRA, on or around 19996-1999.

                  The State filed a Motion to Terminate the Judgment entered in the (GUAJARDO) mail case, this case notice came from John P. DeGeeter, att./V and E-Houston, May 20, 1999. I was advised by Jason Powers, att./V and E (replaced DeGeeter in the case)-- follows is a quote from G.G. by Powers " While we recognize and appreciate your past efforts as Class representative, it is our understanding that you are no longer the Class representative and information regarding on going court proceedings are sent by our office only to current Class representatives"

                  So, you see Dwight, I was illegally pushed out of the mail case, My case. So, I really do not know who the Class or so called Class Representatives were or if they even were on the side of the State.

                  I do not know what they Did or Did Not do? But, I do know that the case was reopened by the inmates because of the denial of Publications ( Sexual).

                  So you see Dwight, that is why all these problems began, with that type of inmate. Now, the Whole Mail Rules, the Mail case, is messed up. It is going to be real hard to fix but I believe in my Appeal and the recent Supreme Court-Texas case on Consent Decree. I have a pretty good argument but I still need a lot of help. For one, I need a copy of the Court Order of Sept. 20,2003. I do not have one and to know the name of the attorneys on both sides in the Appeal they filed. Please keep me posted.

                  Tu Amigo,
                  G. G.






                  Copyright © 2008-2009 TPNS